How to Get Ranked on a Daily Journal List

by Cheryl on May 24, 2013

Yesterday, I gave you tips on how to get ranked in Chambers USA based on comments by Laura Mills, editor of Chambers USA.  David Houston, editor of the Daily Journal was also a panelist at Wednesday’s Legal Marketing Association program in Los Angeles and he provided similar advice about submissions for his publications’ list.   The following are highlights of his comments on how to get the attention of the paper’s editorial staff:

  • Tell us about the work in real time. If an attorney was involved in a case or deal, inform the staff.  Even if the paper does not write about them, they still want a heads up.
  • Consider scheduling roundtables with the editorial staff, but not during the selection process.  This will give the editorial team the chance to put a face with a name and learn about your firm’s practices/deals/cases.
  • Wondering about extensions? David said file your weakest submissions early. By the 11th hour, the editorial team is fatigued and may not have the energy to identify great candidates.
  • When writing the nominations, give the highlights.  There is no need to provide a lot of narrative. They can find that information on your firm’s website.
  • You want to get their attention?  David said his staff is reading hundreds of  nominations and at some point they all start sounding the same.  Make an effort to tell the staff why your candidate stands out.
  • If the attorney you are nominating has handled a case or deal that is novel, unique or let to a decision that impacted the legal or business industry, explain it clearly and play it up.  Reporters wil ultimately have to write articles about the attorneys on the list so it’s wide to explain why your candidate is newsworthy.

What about the coveted Top 100 Lawyers in California?  David said people are chosen for this list based on their work.  If you attorney has a recognizable name in the industry and was involved in high-profile cases or deals, chances are that attorney will be ranked with or without submitting a formal nomination.  But, feel free to send an email to remind the editorial staff of that attorney, listing some of those highlights, or put in a call into David to remind him. The editorial staff plays a great role in nominating attorneys in their beats so you can contact them as well.  Beyond the big players, consider nominating the up-and-coming attorneys and people whose work is done outside of California since the publication is not focused on matters outside of the state.  And, there is no maximum number of attorneys a firm can nominate for the top 100.

How to get ignored or dumped from the list?  It’s the same thing Laura Mills said about Chamber’s; Lying.  David and his staff are always skeptical (it’s the nature of reporters) so they will question the facts in the nomination, such as whether someone is lead counsel.  In one case, David got a call from an attorney on the East Coast stating that his partner took credit for all of his work. Clearly state whether your candidate was lead or co-counsel.

It seems like the Daily Journal is offering new lists each year and 2014 will be no exception. Watch out for an entertainment supplement in 2014.

And, for those attorneys who like to rub shoulders with other top lawyers in their field?  The DJ will offer more networking opportunities. There will be two Top 40 parties, one in Southern California and the other in Northern California.

short001btn How to Get Ranked on a Daily Journal List
share save 171 16 How to Get Ranked on a Daily Journal List

{ 0 comments }

Rankings Directories, Rankings, and Accolades: What you need to knowDirectories, Rankings and Awards are the cause of massive headaches for the marketer and PR processionals who are responsible for developing them, yet rankings and awards are not going anywhere. In fact, they are multiplying like rabbits in springtime.

Knowing how important our role is in this process, the Los Angeles chapter of the Legal Marketing Association held a program on the topic moderated by Laura Shovlowsky, marketing and business development manager at Proskauer Rose. The panelists provided some insight into what we need to know to be efficient and more importantly successful, and hopefully make the process less painful.   Even if you are not submitting to Chambers or the Daily Journal, a California-based legal publication, some of this information is still relevant for other business and legal awards and rankings.

So, what do you need to know to successfully submit to Chambers?  Here are the highlights from Chambers’ Editor Laura Mills:

Best practices:

  • Use the submission template. People often try to create their own but the Chambers submission tells you exactly the information you need.
  • Do not put an attorney bio on the submission. It’s what Laura called the ‘wall of texts’. Her researcher can find that information online.
  • Quality over quantity
  • Make sure to target the work that stands out and show what is unique about the work
  • Make clear what is confidential
  • Submit 15 references only and max out list
  • Overloading information is misguided because researchers get fatigued
  • Do not be a jerk (especially attorneys) on the phone, even though it will not affect your ranking
  • Do not lie to the researchers
  • If you put a ‘dud’ on the phone with a researcher, the chances of that attorney being interviewed the following year is slim to none.
  • A big submission is considered 20 pages.  Avoid sending more as her team gets fatigued.
  • Be aware that submitting needs to be on time this year, as Chambers is scaling back on its interviews of firm partners.
  • You do not need to repeat contacts and clients, as the researchers will not call them more than once.
  • No need to submit references early.  That will not help with your rankings.
  • Research begins one month after reference information is submitted.    For example if a deadline is July 1, your firm clients will be contacted about a month later.
  • All information needs to be uploaded to the website.  If you send it to a researcher that does not mean it was officially submitted.

According to Laura, her researchers will look at state level submissions for nation-wide rankings. And, if the state and national nominations were not enough, Laura said there are two new lists this year:

  • Managing Partner Interviews. Chambers will choose firms that it has on its radar and/or firms that have been ranked in the past.
  • Chambers 100, a ranking of the top 100 attorneys in the USA.

So when your attorneys ask you about how to get ranked?  Here is the response: Either you had a great year and everyone is talking about you or, you may have had several years of good work and Chambers will look at who has been talked about by others and may accommodate for people who consistently get nice comments.

How to fall off the list? Lying. And, if  and attorney has had multiple years of no feedback or negative feedback, do not expect to be on this year’s list.

 

short001btn Directories, Rankings, and Accolades: What you need to know
share save 171 16 Directories, Rankings, and Accolades: What you need to know

{ 0 comments }

Is Writing an eBook Worth Your Time?

May 2, 2013

Warning!  Writing an ebook takes a lot of your time and someone will profit from it, just not you. The emails never say that. Instead, companies hide behind enticing offers masked as exciting marketing opportunities. Today, my client received an urgent invitation from a publishing company to be an author of ebook, which claims this opportunity will help him become [...]

Share
Read the full article →

Writing Advice for Lawyers

March 11, 2013

I review a lot of articles, bios, client alerts, news releases, and blog posts for lawyers.  Since I have a journalism background I often get frustrated with the way lawyers approach their (non-legal) writing.  I know the best writing captures a reader’s attention with a smart and creative headline and a strong opening that gives the reader the [...]

Share
Read the full article →

Social Media Solidifies Client Relationships

March 7, 2013

I have a client who is extremely active on social media. She maintains a well-read blog, posts regularly on Linkedin and Twitter and adds insightful and amusing antidotes on her Facebook page.  She is open about her professional and personal life, which I admire because I am not as forthcoming. But, as a consultant to her [...]

Share
Read the full article →

Where is your network when you need it?

March 4, 2013

News broke last week of 65 people let go from Patton Boggs.  Whenever I see news of layoffs or hear of someone forced to find a new job, I wonder how many of those people are scrambling to connect with their online (Linkedin, especially) and in-person networks. I know they are to updating their online profiles [...]

Share
Read the full article →

Fall In Love Again With Your Blog

February 14, 2013

Blogs are like relationships and relationships go through many stages.  When the flame dims, it’s a signal that it is time to stroke the fire that made you fall in love with blogging and all that it has to offer. That is how I feel about my blog.  When I started it, I blogged at [...]

Share
Read the full article →

Legal Administrator’s Playbook for Marketing

February 13, 2013

Legal Administrators are often tasked with wearing more than one hat, and  marketing is often one of them. A responsibility that they frequently have little or no training and some times struggle with managing it all.   That was the purpose of yesterday’s Greater Los Angeles Chapter of Association of Legal Administrators panel, which included Vickie [...]

Share
Read the full article →

Relating to the Public: The Customer Service/Customer Loyalty Connection

January 31, 2013

I can’t tell you how many times I have called a receptionist at a law firm and the person on the other end of the phone does not know the names of their marketing or PR staff.   The same goes for calling a company and having the person on the other end of the [...]

Share
Read the full article →

Despite Recent CA Court of Appeals Case, Legal Marketing Pays Off

December 3, 2012

The Recorder published an article today about a 2011 defamation lawsuit San Francisco-based attorney William Gwire brought against a former client that may create new law and possibly will serve as a warning to lawyers: Market yourself enough, and you become an assailable public figure.   The lawsuit against Elliot Blumberg, a hedge fund manager, resulted from Blumberg’s “scathing” [...]

Share
Read the full article →